ITRCA

Actually I agree completely. I guess by stock I mean nothing was added to the car. Also, the weight savings were probably in the 40 pound range including the exhaust. Still, that sounds like a good time for a "stock" four cylinder front wheel drive car. My point is to type Rs

I agree with you on a lot of things. I will point out a few exceptions though. A Carrera 4 running 5.1 is a huge gap on a 5.9 second car. Thats almost a full second by 60 mph. Thats a big gap. On a 9 second 0-60 car thats not much but the lower that number gets the harder it is to knock a few tenths...

Yeah yeah yeah I know I don't have a type R but I do have an S2000 and a quick CRX...VTECnologyF20C on AIM and yahoo

I'm just curiouse what kind of numbers you've seen and where. A buddy of mine who is also my mechanic put down over 450 whp in a B18C5 powered 93 civic hatch. The kicker...stock block. No sleeves, no block guard, no nothing. He had pistons and head work obviously but nothing done to the block itself...

If when you say high 5 you mean like 5.8-5.9 then it's entirely possible. I won't say easy like your friend but not impossible. I don't really take into consideration what car magazines say either. I've seen 1/4 mile times for an S2000 as low as 13.9 and as high as 14.8 in various magazines. Usually...

nice car. I love Type Rs. You could probably tell from my sig...I have an S2000 and a B16 CRX. I'm new here too, just thought I'd say hey. Dope site