just wanted anyone thoughts on the J's intake compared to others such as mugen, aem, comptech. Any info would be cool
BTW tried search function
thoughts on J's intake
Re: thoughts on J's intake
bump someone has to have this or heard of it
-
- ITRCA Member
- Posts: 418
- Joined: September 12th, 2002, 8:12 am
- Location: Culpeper Virginia (Besieged)
- Contact:
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Yup.jonesdx wrote:bump someone has to have this or heard of it
It's a weird looking thing, but has a good reputation. On some installations, it seems to rub against the strut bar and wear itself.
In some recent tests, Steve Sakai was surprised how well it did on the dyno. It's on some Honda Challenge cars, and the people who use it praise it for its throttle response.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: September 11th, 2002, 1:42 pm
- Location: At Helltrack doing backflips
- Contact:
Re: thoughts on J's intake
I'd take the Mugen first, then it'd be a toss up between the j's racing penis and the comptech icebox.jonesdx wrote:just wanted anyone thoughts on the J's intake compared to others such as mugen, aem, comptech. Any info would be cool
BTW tried search function
-Dave
Some DC2s and a pimp Grand Marquis
Some DC2s and a pimp Grand Marquis
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Pros: Throttle response, increased midrange, 3k/6k rpm resonance spikes.
Cons: Cost (cf version), rubs everything around it, needs cold air ducting to be more efficient.
Better than the AEM, comparable to the icebox, Mugen 0wnz all.
Cons: Cost (cf version), rubs everything around it, needs cold air ducting to be more efficient.
Better than the AEM, comparable to the icebox, Mugen 0wnz all.
Re: thoughts on J's intake
well the mugen is insanely expensive, the J's only cost about 240, thats what I have seen that is.