Integra Type-R Discussion - Discuss general ITR information, technical information (including requests for technical/mechanical help/assistance), modifications, tuning, etc.
1337
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 8 Joined: February 11th, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: SoCal
Post
by 1337 » February 20th, 2004, 1:37 am
Is it truethat the 2000 and 2001 ITRs are faster than the 97-98 ITRs...if so why is that and by how much...j/w
Last edited by
1337 on February 29th, 2004, 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
adddddaaammmm
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 4 Joined: February 16th, 2004, 1:28 am
Location: orange county
Post
by adddddaaammmm » February 20th, 2004, 5:00 am
if your talking about usdm itrs they didnt make it in 99.
Bbasso
Post Whore!!
Posts: 6571 Joined: September 25th, 2002, 1:21 am
Location: South Carolina !
Contact:
Post
by Bbasso » February 20th, 2004, 11:22 am
00fbpitr54 wrote: if your talking about usdm itrs they didnt make it in 99.
Sure they did, just not imported into the US.
AS for the times, they should be with in a tenth of each other. nothing more then a difference in the cam.
swed
Kangbateh
ITRCA Member
Posts: 162 Joined: January 24th, 2003, 3:39 am
Location: Minnesota
Post
by Kangbateh » February 20th, 2004, 11:28 am
I've also heard that the 2000-01 are a bit faster. I guess the difference is slightly noticed, unless your a skilled experienced race driver.
AlvinOne7
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 29 Joined: January 12th, 2004, 7:23 pm
Location: Chicago
Post
by AlvinOne7 » February 21st, 2004, 1:55 am
I heard that the pistons on the 00-01s are slightly better then the ones on the 97-98s.....
DsR
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 2 Joined: February 21st, 2004, 2:25 pm
Post
by DsR » February 21st, 2004, 3:45 pm
The intake cam on 2000-2001 is different than 97-98. IIRC it's the CTR intake cam.
D
97ITR #262
97 SH
88 Celica ST
98cwitr
ITRCA Member
Posts: 207 Joined: November 21st, 2002, 9:54 pm
Post
by 98cwitr » February 22nd, 2004, 3:47 am
the only diff is the intake cam. its a tad bit more aggressive but not by much more...
'98 Integra Type R #363
tonyanjaii
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 17 Joined: November 6th, 2003, 7:31 pm
Location: fairfax, va
Post
by tonyanjaii » February 26th, 2004, 10:23 am
pistons are the same, intake cam is different.
but what also is over looked is the ECU. now THAT is different as well.
opie
ITRCA Member
Posts: 260 Joined: July 7th, 2003, 1:01 pm
Location: Car's Gone, NY
Post
by opie » February 26th, 2004, 5:33 pm
I read 97-98 run 15.1
00'-01's run 14.7
That was car and driver I believe. I may be wrong on the mag but not the #'s. There are just too many variables to be sure if anyone year was built "faster" than other's.
e r i c s 9 9 s i
ITRCA Member
Posts: 195 Joined: May 11th, 2003, 4:30 pm
Contact:
Post
by e r i c s 9 9 s i » February 26th, 2004, 10:14 pm
OPIE112 wrote: I read 97-98 run 15.1
00'-01's run 14.7
That was car and driver I believe. I may be wrong on the mag but not the #'s. There are just too many variables to be sure if anyone year was built "faster" than other's.
Intake cam is the only difference between the two motors..
revolution8k
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 30 Joined: December 23rd, 2003, 8:33 pm
Location: fort wayne
Contact:
Post
by revolution8k » February 28th, 2004, 7:24 am
1997 Acura Integra Type R 7.0 15.3
1998 Acura Integra Type R 6.6 15.1
2000 Acura Integra Type R 6.2 14.8
4/10ths difference between the years. I don't have any numbers on the 01 model.