Posted: September 28th, 2006, 11:46 am
This lens pretty much >allcanuckr wrote: I lilkey this step-up.
Canon has a similar one that was about $80k
This lens pretty much >allcanuckr wrote: I lilkey this step-up.
because our hobbies will be the ruin of us all.ITR Factor wrote:Yeah I just bought a 17-55mm 2.8 for my Nikon, I'm broke from that. Why am I looking at new bikes now!
nope. you got it wrongDave_B wrote:No, I think I'm actually right this time. Effects are like special effects. Affects would be like aftecting me with your silly yawns.Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds wrote:effects.Dave_B wrote:stop that, I'm already feeling the affects...Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds wrote:*yawn*
Feeling the effects.Dave_B wrote: Ha ha, young Padawan, welcome to the Engrish language. Look up affect to in your searching. There is affect and effect. Both are used in different ways kind of like to, too and two.
They're all getting very inexpensive. Or at least the prices have and are continuing to come way down.Doespike wrote:$80k lens, holy cow!
Always wanted to pic up a dig SLR ever since that first Digital Rebel from Canon came out. I spend alot of time in the woods in the spring, summer, fall, and winter so I've had many a great shots where I wish I had a good camera. Usually settled for a P&S shot.
Actually now that I look it up again it was $89k, but that included a hard case and a major tripod. Weighed 36lbs...... Only a handful in existence.Doespike wrote:$80k lens, holy cow!
Yea, prices are latelyErik95LS wrote:They're all getting very inexpensive. Or at least the prices have and are continuing to come way down.Doespike wrote:$80k lens, holy cow!
Always wanted to pic up a dig SLR ever since that first Digital Rebel from Canon came out. I spend alot of time in the woods in the spring, summer, fall, and winter so I've had many a great shots where I wish I had a good camera. Usually settled for a P&S shot.
Geez, bet you could see a Martian picking his nose with that thing!!!Erik95LS wrote:Actually now that I look it up again it was $89k, but that included a hard case and a major tripod. Weighed 36lbs...... Only a handful in existence.Doespike wrote:$80k lens, holy cow!
Yea, and prob can't focus on anything closer than 75 feetDoespike wrote:Geez, bet you could see a Martian picking his nose with that thing!!!Erik95LS wrote:Actually now that I look it up again it was $89k, but that included a hard case and a major tripod. Weighed 36lbs...... Only a handful in existence.Doespike wrote:$80k lens, holy cow!
The moon!ITR Factor wrote:I was trying to find information about that lens, I'm glad it was brought up. What do you shoot with that thing?
if you just search for "canon 1200mm" you'll get all kinds of info. You could shoot anything with it........as long as its bright out and really far away. Wildlife would be the best thing I can think of. Or maybe seeing what color driver's eyes are on the other end of the track.ITR Factor wrote:I was trying to find information about that lens, I'm glad it was brought up. What do you shoot with that thing?
Hell jaa.. I was gonig to post that one, but didnt want to steal someones pixor..Erik95LS wrote:This lens pretty much >allcanuckr wrote: I lilkey this step-up.
Canon has a similar one that was about $80k
for $80k, you could get the SR8canuckr wrote:Hell jaa.. I was gonig to post that one, but didnt want to steal someones pixor..Erik95LS wrote:This lens pretty much >allcanuckr wrote: I lilkey this step-up.
Canon has a similar one that was about $80k
I can find better things to spend 80k on.. Like a Radical SR3..
Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds wrote:
ITS ALMOST 2M HAR3 DORK!!11!11111!!!1 PLUS I ONLEY GOT LIEK 5 HOURS OF SLEP LAST NIGHT!
DMMIT!!!!11!!!!!!1!1!11! WTF LOL DAEV!111! OMG IMM SLEPY!!1111!11!!1!111!1!! WTF LOL
Ayewalker111 wrote:Anyone else bored as hell?