Page 930 of 1582
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 1:54 pm
by tartje
walker111 wrote:tartje wrote:walker111 wrote:she said she was just jealous that she couldnt do the same
hello bitches
btw
mike why you no have mugen intake?
cant afford it
Mugen Intake > ***
accept no substitute
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 1:54 pm
by tartje
i'm good at this paging business
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 2:03 pm
by walker111
tartje wrote:i'm good at this paging business
lol, joo got the moogen intke?
I think everyone would agree on seeing more pics of your car.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 2:05 pm
by tartje
i shall provide more pics of my car this weekend when i get home from college, right now i have to go to tutorial
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 2:05 pm
by tartje
but yes i do have one
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 2:23 pm
by Bbasso
tartje wrote:
Mugen Intake > ***
accept no substitute
I would have to disagree with that. I like the top end power the AEM CAI gives over the Mugen and the weight of the AEM CAI is a bunch less. While being cheaper, easier to install and less bling.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 3:19 pm
by walker111
Bbasso wrote:tartje wrote:
Mugen Intake > ***
accept no substitute
I would have to disagree with that. I like the top end power the AEM CAI gives over the Mugen and the weight of the AEM CAI is a bunch less. While being cheaper, easier to install and less bling.
1. I think you would change your mind if you had it.
2. Is there really that much weight savings? The actual cold air part of the mugen intake is incredibly light. The heavy parts would be the filter/stock intake arm. The weight difference would be extremely (extremely) un-noticeable. You happen to have the dyno plot for your car(with AEM)?
3. The mugen intake is not incredibly hard to install, it is a quality part, that fits in a quality way.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 3:45 pm
by get RIGHT
walker111 wrote:Bbasso wrote:tartje wrote:
Mugen Intake > ***
accept no substitute
I would have to disagree with that. I like the top end power the AEM CAI gives over the Mugen and the weight of the AEM CAI is a bunch less. While being cheaper, easier to install and less bling.
1. I think you would change your mind if you had it.
2. Is there really that much weight savings? The actual cold air part of the mugen intake is incredibly light. The heavy parts would be the filter/stock intake arm. The weight difference would be extremely (extremely) un-noticeable. You happen to have the dyno plot for your car(with AEM)?
3. The mugen intake is not incredibly hard to install, it is a quality part, that fits in a quality way.
Couldnt have said it better myself.
Not too mention the quietness of the Mugen and the mid range response is second to none.
Can I get an amen?
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:21 pm
by Doespike
Amen Brother! Amen!! Hallaluya!!
Always thought AEM was more blingy with their paint jobs. Mugen has that sexy gloss black.
<--no personal experience with either intake
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:39 pm
by Bbasso
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:41 pm
by walker111
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:43 pm
by walker111
Funny, our top end looks the same.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:46 pm
by Bbasso
I have 1 HP less and 2.4 more TQ
Things that make you go hrmmm
and this is on Jack's dyno.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:48 pm
by walker111
Marroon is before the mooooogen intake.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:49 pm
by Bbasso
SO why even campare the chart or even post that one?
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:51 pm
by walker111
Bbasso wrote:SO why even campare the chart or even post that one?
What do you mean? Before the mugen intake I had a sri with a k&n filter.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:51 pm
by Bbasso
EG6-DC2 and I were comparing charts the other day...
He has very close mods to DaveB and puts out nearly the same power. While I'm only 5HP less and I think a few more TQ then the both of 'em.
The price of the mugen is not worth it in my book.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:53 pm
by Bbasso
walker111 wrote:
Marroon is before the mooooogen intake.
I thought you called me a moron with bad spelling
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:53 pm
by Mugen Mike
tartje wrote:btw mike why you no have mugen intake?
Just never got around to ordering one I guess. I will pick one up before Expo though - and I will do TUNED back-to-back dyno runs of the Mugen intake -vs- the AEM when the time comes.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:54 pm
by Bbasso
so the two charts you posted, which is your's with the moogen and most current?
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 4:54 pm
by Mugen Mike
walker111 wrote:tartje wrote:walker111 wrote:she said she was just jealous that she couldnt do the same
hello bitches
btw
mike why you no have mugen intake?
cant afford it
Jim, I don't care how big j00 are - j00r going DOWN next time I see j00!
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 5:12 pm
by Bbasso
so I smelt something odd, a burning smell...
I traced it to my ceiling fan.
It's been org from day one...
Time to redo the wiring on it
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 5:14 pm
by walker111
Bbasso wrote:so the two charts you posted, which is your's with the moogen and most current?
The first one. That is the most current with 120k on the motor. DaveB doesnt have cams and is practically a brand new motor. I think it has less than 15k on it. Nolan has cams, mild, but still.
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 5:14 pm
by walker111
Bbasso wrote:walker111 wrote:
Marroon is before the mooooogen intake.
I thought you called me a moron with bad spelling
lol, no, maroon as in color, dufus!
Posted: January 30th, 2007, 5:15 pm
by walker111
Mugen Mike wrote:walker111 wrote:tartje wrote:walker111 wrote:she said she was just jealous that she couldnt do the same
hello bitches
btw
mike why you no have mugen intake?
cant afford it
Jim, I don't care how big j00 are - j00r going DOWN next time I see j00!
I was just repeating what Comp said....
