Page 119 of 1582

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:05 pm
by Reid
Erik95LS wrote:you're considered old.
I already consider myself old because I only drink alcohol maybe twice a month nowadays. :o

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:06 pm
by Erik95LS
Reid wrote:
You can say turbo ITR's are ghey, but let's not get all crazy and say that boost in general is a bad thing. :P
I'm just teasing boosted cars can be alot of fun (at least when they come that way from the factory or are completely built right), but no matter what NA will always be better in my mind. The power just feels so much better.

That said. I would kill for a 180sx with an sr20det at about 400whp :D

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:09 pm
by Reid
Erik95LS wrote:x eleventybillion!!!!!!
S14 Silvia with F9k/R9k suspension > DC2 ITR with F22k/R18k suspension

This is the main thing I'm looking forward to. I already drive the mother-in-law's Mercedes 99% of the time because I've made this ITR too track oriented for the street.

I drove the car to buy ice cream at a convenience store tonight though. :P

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:09 pm
by walker111
Reid wrote:
walker111 wrote:and I think you gave me mine on HT.
Did I?

If I did, I'm betting it was Dave B's idea. :P
Yes and I bet your right. I dont get it at all...... "cool guy name" FTL

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:11 pm
by Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds
Erik95LS wrote:
Reid wrote:
You can say turbo ITR's are ghey, but let's not get all crazy and say that boost in general is a bad thing. :P
I'm just teasing boosted cars can be alot of fun (at least when they come that way from the factory or are completely built right), but no matter what NA will always be better in my mind. The power just feels so much better.

That said. I would kill for a 180sx with an sr20det at about 400whp :D
sr20det sucks goat ass. ca18det all the way baby!!!

Oh and good morning, whores. :wink:

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:14 pm
by Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds
walker111 wrote:
Reid wrote:
walker111 wrote:and I think you gave me mine on HT.
Did I?

If I did, I'm betting it was Dave B's idea. :P
Yes and I bet your right. I dont get it at all...... "cool guy name" FTL
hrrrmmmmm. I want a cool title too.

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:15 pm
by Reid
Erik95LS wrote:I'm just teasing boosted cars can be alot of fun (at least when they come that way from the factory or are completely built right), but no matter what NA will always be better in my mind. The power just feels so much better.
I will always prefer N/A also. I think it all comes down to the better throttle response that only N/A can provide. A nice boosted setup can come close, but N/A will always be better as far as throttle response goes. :D
Erik95LS wrote:That said. I would kill for a 180sx with an sr20det at about 400whp :D
180sx's and S13's are too old already, IMHO. The S14 is pushing it as far as age goes, but I'm just trying to use that car to learn before I pick up a S15.

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:16 pm
by Reid
brokenhearted wrote:sr20det sucks goat ass. ca18det all the way baby!!!

Oh and good morning, whores. :wink:
...and that brings me to my next point, "Don't smoke crack".





:P

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:16 pm
by Reid
walker111 wrote:Yes and I bet your right. I dont get it at all...... "cool guy name" FTL
What do you want it to say? It's not hard to change titles at all. :)

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:17 pm
by Erik95LS
Reid wrote:S14 Silvia with F9k/R9k suspension > DC2 ITR with F22k/R18k suspension
However..... 2001 s2k with hardtop, TODA header, AEM EMS with Yacktune, and 10kf 10kr > *Silvias :P

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:19 pm
by Erik95LS
Reid wrote:180sx's and S13's are too old already, IMHO. The S14 is pushing it as far as age goes, but I'm just trying to use that car to learn before I pick up a S15.
I just like the smaller, fairly lightweight chassis, the hatchback, and the looks of the car far better than any of the other ones.

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:20 pm
by Reid
Erik95LS wrote:However..... 2001 s2k with hardtop, TODA header, AEM EMS with Yacktune, and 10kf 10kr > *Silvias :P
I'm still going to try to work a S2000 into the stable when I get back to the States. It was supposed to be a sure thing, but I'm beginning to think that I may have to chose between the S2000 and another car (to which the S2000 cannot hold a candle).

It'll be unfortunate if I can't find a way to get a hold of a S2000, as they're GREAT cars. :(

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:22 pm
by Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds
Reid wrote:
brokenhearted wrote:sr20det sucks goat ass. ca18det all the way baby!!!

Oh and good morning, whores. :wink:
...and that brings me to my next point, "Don't smoke crack".





:P
It depends on what you want the engine for. My ca18 is getting ripped apart but I want to keep the bottom end, because it's indestructable. I prefer it. Yeah it's harder to get parts for because it was produced for such a limited time, but I think it's way worth the effort.
And as far as age goes, the 2jzgte is getting up there in age too, does that make it any less spectacular? No.

Regardless, good luck on your car search.

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:22 pm
by Reid
Erik95LS wrote:I just like the smaller, fairly lightweight chassis, the hatchback, and the looks of the car far better than any of the other ones.
The hatchbacks have a flimsy chassis when compared to the coupe. Also, popup headlights FTL!

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:22 pm
by walker111
Reid wrote:
brokenhearted wrote:sr20det sucks goat ass. ca18det all the way baby!!!

Oh and good morning, whores. :wink:
...and that brings me to my next point, "Don't smoke crack".





:P
lol

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:24 pm
by Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds
Have a good day, guys. See you later.

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:24 pm
by Erik95LS
brokenhearted wrote: It depends on what you want the engine for. My ca18 is getting ripped apart but I want to keep the bottom end, because it's indestructable. I prefer it. Yeah it's harder to get parts for because it was produced for such a limited time, but I think it's way worth the effort.
that makes good sense and at least you have valid reasons and aren't just making arbitrary claims based on little to no good reasoning. :)

with that said.......Dawn is teh ghey. :P

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:26 pm
by Erik95LS
Reid wrote:
Erik95LS wrote:I just like the smaller, fairly lightweight chassis, the hatchback, and the looks of the car far better than any of the other ones.
The hatchbacks have a flimsy chassis when compared to the coupe. Also, popup headlights FTL!
Those pop-up headlights are hot, but I grew up around 944s........

The flimsiness isn't going to matter so much once the kind of cage I have in mind gets in there. :wink:

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:26 pm
by walker111
Hatchbacks are fun!

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:28 pm
by Reid
brokenhearted wrote:It depends on what you want the engine for. My ca18 is getting ripped apart but I want to keep the bottom end, because it's indestructable. I prefer it. Yeah it's harder to get parts for because it was produced for such a limited time, but I think it's way worth the effort.
Holy crap!

You're the only person I've ever known who prefers the CA over the SR. Every single one of my friends who drift their 240sx's with SR's has spun rod bearings. They've all gone to built engines since then, and have been bulletproof.

I know the SR won't be bulletproof, and I know I'll probably end up toasting at least one of them, but that's a risk I'm willing to take.
brokenhearted wrote:And as far as age goes, the 2jzgte is getting up there too, does that make it any less spectacular? No.
Please don't take offense to the age comments. It has nothing to do with how good a car/engine is. I'm just strictly speaking about dated looks and dated interiors.

I still really like FD RX7's and some of those are 13 years old already. :O

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:30 pm
by Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds
Reid wrote:
brokenhearted wrote:It depends on what you want the engine for. My ca18 is getting ripped apart but I want to keep the bottom end, because it's indestructable. I prefer it. Yeah it's harder to get parts for because it was produced for such a limited time, but I think it's way worth the effort.
Holy crap!

You're the only person I've ever known who prefers the CA over the SR. Every single one of my friends who drift their 240sx's with SR's has spun rod bearings. They've all gone to built engines since then, and have been bulletproof.

I know the SR won't be bulletproof, and I know I'll probably end up toasting at least one of them, but that's a risk I'm willing to take.
brokenhearted wrote:And as far as age goes, the 2jzgte is getting up there too, does that make it any less spectacular? No.
Please don't take offense to the age comments. It has nothing to do with how good a car/engine is. I'm just strictly speaking about dated looks and dated interiors.

I still really like FD RX7's and some of those are 13 years old already. :O
FD's are one of my favorites, but I LOVE the FC3S's!!!! I would kill for a savannah model...... really. Need any one executed? :wink:

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:30 pm
by Reid
Erik95LS wrote:Those pop-up headlights are hot, but I grew up around 944s........

The flimsiness isn't going to matter so much once the kind of cage I have in mind gets in there. :wink:
I grew up around 911's, so pop-up headlights are the headlights that came on those bastard 944's. :P I'm j/k, though I did grow up around 911's. I just hate how commonly the pop-up headlights on S13's seem to fail. It's a damn shame when only one of your headlights is up.

So you're really building a S13 hatchback? :D

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:32 pm
by Reid
Dammit, I just missed all the good cartoons on TV. :(

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:32 pm
by Erik95LS
Reid wrote:
So you're really building a S13 hatchback? :D
its on one of my many lists of things to do someday. :oops:

Posted: July 19th, 2006, 1:32 pm
by Dawn, Destroyer of Worlds
Since we're talking about them, here's our S13.
http://www.itrca.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6793
There should be pictures scattered throughout the thread.