J's Racing Intake

Integra Type-R Discussion - Discuss general ITR information, technical information (including requests for technical/mechanical help/assistance), modifications, tuning, etc.
Locked
RGoose18
ITRCA Member
Posts: 152
Joined: July 3rd, 2003, 8:40 pm
Location: Northeast

J's Racing Intake

Post by RGoose18 »

What gains can you expect from a J's Intake on a bone stock R?? Also, is it as good as people say?? I'm not a big fan of the AEM CAI and don't have enough cash for a mugen......any suggestions are appreciated.
B2FiNiTY
ITRCA Member
Posts: 318
Joined: September 12th, 2002, 1:21 am
Contact:

Post by B2FiNiTY »

I would definately recommend it for throttle response and good midrange power.

If you are a drag race type person, I would not recommend it.
ITR97
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 65
Joined: February 22nd, 2003, 6:38 am
Location: 1234

Post by ITR97 »

B2FiNiTY wrote:I would definately recommend it for throttle response and good midrange power.

If you are a drag race type person, I would not recommend it.
my friend has the J intake in his R. he loves it because its better throttle respone and midrange power, so its good for normal driving. aem is little low end, and more top end power, still good but u have to be up up in the power band to acess the power.
RGoose18
ITRCA Member
Posts: 152
Joined: July 3rd, 2003, 8:40 pm
Location: Northeast

Post by RGoose18 »

Why's it no good for drag racing, not that I'm really big into it, just wondering?
RGoose18
ITRCA Member
Posts: 152
Joined: July 3rd, 2003, 8:40 pm
Location: Northeast

Post by RGoose18 »

So.................two people on this entire board own J's Intakes???? Hard to believe, I'm looking for some serious feedback, if you have one or have experience w/ one, please respond!
George Knighton
ITRCA Member
Posts: 418
Joined: September 12th, 2002, 8:12 am
Location: Culpeper Virginia (Besieged)
Contact:

Post by George Knighton »

RGoose18 wrote:So.................two people on this entire board own J's Intakes?
Personally I have an Icebox. :P

I was surprised, however, that when one of my mechanics tested the J's Racing intake on a racing ITR that it did give solid gains over other intakes.

Whether or not cold air intakes would exceed the J's Racing's improvements when they're actually getting high speed, cold air, I don't know. But it did show solid gains on the dyno over the other intakes.

There are also cheap plastic copies of the J's Racing intake that make it quite affordable. Not so affordable that I'd dump the Icebox for it, but I would think about it if I were shopping for an intake for the first time.
jonesdx
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 15
Joined: July 18th, 2003, 11:25 pm

J's

Post by jonesdx »

I have the J's and thought the same thing when I came to this board, that npobody responded to my ?. But anyway I love the J's would trade it for any other intake, sounds great, and great midrange, ohh and btw being 6000ft above elev. I need all the help I can get
RGoose18
ITRCA Member
Posts: 152
Joined: July 3rd, 2003, 8:40 pm
Location: Northeast

Post by RGoose18 »

Thanks for the input, now after I pulled a few teeth, I can make the decision and go ahead and get a J's. As for people not answering question's, I definately agree with you. I find that if more feedback were given on IMPORTANT topics such as this, and less time on stupid shit, like whether or not 17's look good on an R, I would spend a lot less time asking people ?'s over at HT. Thanks Again
NewImageTypeR
New ITRCA Member
Posts: 12
Joined: August 3rd, 2003, 10:23 pm
Location: VA
Contact:

Post by NewImageTypeR »

I got the J's too and i like it better than my AEM...more response.
2001 PY-R # 264
New Image Motorsports Member
Mid-Atlantic ITRCA Member

Ever seen 100 Type-R's in one place???
Type-R Expo is where it's at!!!
Image
B2FiNiTY
ITRCA Member
Posts: 318
Joined: September 12th, 2002, 1:21 am
Contact:

Post by B2FiNiTY »

It's not good for drag beacuse sitting at the tree, it sucks in a ton of hot air when are you getting ready to go. Best on the road course where the car is moving.
Chris N
Site Admin
Posts: 1679
Joined: November 6th, 2002, 7:08 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Post by Chris N »

It's a good intake, good gains.

The only intake that completely outsines all others is the Mugen Intake.
RGoose18
ITRCA Member
Posts: 152
Joined: July 3rd, 2003, 8:40 pm
Location: Northeast

Post by RGoose18 »

Although the Mugen is top of the line, the price and fact that you have to bend, or remove A/C lines outweighs the benefits. I think I'll stick w/ a J's for now. From what I've heard they're light years better than an AEM. Plus they're short ram, so I don't have to worry about hydrolock :D
Trey
Site Admin
Posts: 1004
Joined: September 10th, 2002, 11:43 pm
Location: TN
Contact:

Post by Trey »

I think light years is a bit over stating thigs. You probably won't see any more peak power and if you make more power between 4000 and 6000 roms that is great but not practical for actual performance. You will see that power gain one time during a race and that is in first gear from 0-20 mpoh where less power might help traction.

I am not against the J's intake as an option just tossing out other things to think about. We tweak and tweak but honestly you can buy what you like the look or sound of if you stick with the big names and see no apprciable power differences. Some will claim differentl;y but take a large average and not one persons word.

I personally have the Icebox cause it makes the same power when I tested it, it stealthy looking and is QUIET which is the most important part. Nothing worse than the AEM noise.
YellowDragon279
ITRCA Member
Posts: 107
Joined: June 3rd, 2003, 10:05 am
Location: NorthEast
Contact:

Post by YellowDragon279 »

RGoose18 wrote:Thanks for the input, now after I pulled a few teeth, I can make the decision and go ahead and get a J's. As for people not answering question's, I definately agree with you. I find that if more feedback were given on IMPORTANT topics such as this, and less time on stupid shit, like whether or not 17's look good on an R, I would spend a lot less time asking people ?'s over at HT. Thanks Again
If it is QUANTITY of comments you want then by all mean go to H-T but personally I would like QUALITY responses such as you got here.

Why you would need 30-40 people to tell you its good power upgrade i have no clue. Actually you're only missing the "Fluff" you get 40 people commenting on your question and MAYBE 5 are going to have something to do with the question and the other 35 will be "It looks ugly." or "Overrated" something stupid like that. Be happy that you actually got decent comments.
My comment on the Intake is that it is a good improvement over LOTs of other intake systems
Carbon Fiber Design works well to INSULATE the air in the Chamber. The Design acts as a funnel to insure even in the BENDS the tube is filled with AIR. The Air is accelerated at the mouth due to a kind of Venturi effect. The ONLY thing I would suggest that is a cold air induction box be incorporated.
Another point to make is that CAI can't be effectively tested on a DYNO and Neither can an Short Ram due to the fact that the FAN used to keep the engine cool is not Similating the AIR flow at Highway or race track speeds. Just something to keep in mind.
The Only Easy Day was Yesterday
RGoose18
ITRCA Member
Posts: 152
Joined: July 3rd, 2003, 8:40 pm
Location: Northeast

Post by RGoose18 »

In reply to your comment about people giving me "fluff", I understand your point. Although, you don't understand that it took two seperate threads for me to get even one answer. I don't want 300 comments that all sound the same, yet I would appreciate a comment period. Otherwise, thanks for your input about the intakes, I'll keep that in mind[/quote]
Locked