Page 1 of 1
thoughts on J's intake
Posted: July 19th, 2003, 7:03 pm
by jonesdx
just wanted anyone thoughts on the J's intake compared to others such as mugen, aem, comptech. Any info would be cool
BTW tried search function
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Posted: July 23rd, 2003, 8:38 pm
by jonesdx
bump someone has to have this or heard of it
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Posted: July 24th, 2003, 11:35 pm
by George Knighton
jonesdx wrote:bump someone has to have this or heard of it
Yup.
It's a weird looking thing, but has a good reputation. On some installations, it seems to rub against the strut bar and wear itself.
In some recent tests, Steve Sakai was surprised how well it did on the dyno. It's on some Honda Challenge cars, and the people who use it praise it for its throttle response.
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Posted: July 24th, 2003, 11:51 pm
by Dave-ROR
jonesdx wrote:just wanted anyone thoughts on the J's intake compared to others such as mugen, aem, comptech. Any info would be cool
BTW tried search function
I'd take the Mugen first, then it'd be a toss up between the j's racing penis and the comptech icebox.
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Posted: July 25th, 2003, 10:59 pm
by B2FiNiTY
Pros: Throttle response, increased midrange, 3k/6k rpm resonance spikes.
Cons: Cost (cf version), rubs everything around it, needs cold air ducting to be more efficient.
Better than the AEM, comparable to the icebox, Mugen 0wnz all.
Re: thoughts on J's intake
Posted: July 26th, 2003, 4:56 am
by jonesdx
well the mugen is insanely expensive, the J's only cost about 240, thats what I have seen that is.